Review · APAC Launch
Q2 review
The committed plan came up for its scheduled review. Here's what held, what changed, what broke, and what you checked — measured against the version you committed.
This is a scheduled review, not a reopen. It landed on the plan's own Q2 cadence, so lucix counts it as a review — reopened Jul 8 → Q2 review. Durability is measured from the calendar, never from a label anyone picked; only an unscheduled revisit reopens.
3 held
1 checked
1 broke
5 committed decisions reviewed
Pipeline readiness
committed Mar 12 · R. Delgado
Delivered as committed and unchanged through the season.
Partner motion
committed Mar 14 · J. Kaur
Held — no change since it committed.
Budget
committed $46M · $4M accepted to Q2 · S. Iyer
The Q2 $4M came due and was checked in — it landed, and the accepted risk cleared.
Data migration timeline
committed Apr 2 · on G. Tan's condition
The condition broke: Platform v2 slipped a second time. On the record, in their words:
“Platform v2 didn't land in March or April. Migration is now May — the condition I set held exactly as written.”
Headcount
committed 8 · J. Kaur
Held at 8.
A broke is not a failure — it's the truth arriving on schedule. The Data-migration condition did its job: it named the real dependency at commit time, so when Platform v2 slipped, the plan bent honestly instead of pretending. This review changes nothing on its own — to move the May date onto the record, open a new round; the committed plan stays exactly as it was.