Every moment here conveys a real state, relationship, or pace — and nothing pulses, chases, or pressures. Click things. Tactility is invisible in a screenshot. Flip the switch to preview exactly what a visitor with reduce-motion sees: the end-state always survives, only the movement drops.
Physical, quiet feedback: press settles the button in, a row lifts toward you, focus arrives with a soft ring. No bounce, no glow — the feeling is paper and ink responding, not an arcade.
Press & hover
Hover the row; press the buttons. Feedback is ≤120ms — instant, never latency.
Focus
Focus is a soft navy ring, not a jump. Keyboard-Tab through this section: every focus is visible and calm.
The sanctioned answer to dense surfaces: collapsed by default, opening in place with a short staggered reveal so you read the group as a group. Nothing is hidden from anyone entitled to see it — it's one click away.
Click the header. Open it, then flip reduce-motion above and open it again — the rows still appear, just without the stagger.
In a serious tool, delight isn't confetti — it's the product's own verbs made tactile. Each of these fires once, on a real event, in ~460ms. Trigger them.
Press Replay the season. Watch the decision graph assemble at the pace it actually happened: Sales resolved fast, Engineering laboured, Finance never engaged. You feel the pace — because this is a replay of what already happened, not a live status. That distinction is the whole law: narrate history, never pressure the present.
The idea you raised — letting a user feel where decisions moved fast, slow, or got blocked — is strong and product-true (the map is grown from real acts; velocity is the core signal). It also brushes the boundary law, so here's the recommendation, the line, and the alternatives.
Flow/pace motion lives only on surfaces that narrate the past: the retrospective replay (T14) as its home (a scrubbable season you watch assemble), the map with on-demand flow (hover/select an edge to replay its pace — never ambient), and the exec readout (T15) where MT2R + durability already live. Pace is encoded by the timing and easing of the draw itself (confident vs. laboured) plus plain residue labels — no new reserved color, so PL-1/PL-2/PL-7 stay intact.
Legal: narrating elapsed pace on committed-time data, after the fact. Forbidden: animating a live, unanswered ask to feel "stuck / behind / urgent" — that is pressure on silence (boundary + notification laws). The tell: does the motion describe what already happened, or push someone to act now?
Proceeding on option A as the working assumption; the map's visual language remains a separate consciously-open item, so A's map specifics fold into that decision when it's taken.